EU tightens measures to combat Money-Laundering
Financial institutions and other entities falling under the European Union anti-money laundering regime would now have to consider not only Financial Assets Task Force (‘FATF’) list of the jurisdictions with weak measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing (commonly referred to as ‘FATF blacklist’) in their risk assessment practices, but also the list of third countries with weak AML/CFT regimes drawn out by the European Commission. And for the first time, this list includes Top 20 World’s Economies.
On February 13, 2019, the European Commission (‘Commission’) adopted changes to the list of the non-EU countries with strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT frameworks. Notably, the Commission’s list includes 12 countries that have been already added to the FATF blacklist together with 11 additional jurisdictions. So, currently, the Commission’s list consists of 23 countries.
The aim of this move is to protect the EU financial system, which follows the highest AML/CFT standards, by better preventing money laundering and terrorist financing risks and ensuring that illegally gained money from third countries does not integrate to the EU financial market.
As reported, the countries chosen for the assessment by the Commission meet at least one of the following criteria:
• they have systemic impact on the integrity of the EU financial system;
• they are reviewed by the International Monetary Fund as international offshore financial centers; or
• they have economic relevance and strong economic ties with the EU.
Based on the expertise of FATF, the Commission has also considered the level of existing threat, the legal framework, and controls put in place to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing risks and their effective implementation.
What does it mean?
As long as the Commission’s list becomes effective, the EU member states will have to commit to a higher level of scrutiny for transactions involving customers and financial institutions form the listed countries in order to better identify any suspicious money flows. This will also stand for the provision of faster access for law enforcement agencies undertaking counterterrorism investigations.
When to expect?
The list was adopted in the form of a so-called ‘delegated regulation’, which requires further submission to the European Parliament and Council for approval within one month (with a possible one-month extension). Once approved, the Delegated Regulation will be published in the Official Journal and will enter into force 20 days after its publication.
What is notable?
Amongst others, four United States territories turned up on the list, which was a quite unexpected move from the EU. In particular, these are American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
On the same day, the action was addressed by The US Department of the Treasury, which expressed “significant concerns about the substance of the list and the flawed process by which it was developed”, the administration said in its press release.
The Department insists on the contradiction of the Commission’s list to FATF methodology (notably, mentioned US territories are not included in FATF list) and totally rejects the inclusion of the US territories on the list, arguing that the same AML/CFT legal framework that applies to the continental US also applies to all US territories.
What is even more unexpected is that the Department stated it does not expect US financial institutions to take the Commission’s list into account in course of their AML/CFT policies and procedures.
Another noteworthy thing is the first ever Top 20 Economies (according to IMF) appearance on the Commission’s list and it is referred to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nevertheless, in its press release on the matter, the Kingdom reaffirms that “it is strongly committed to the common fight against money laundering and terrorism financing, a commitment that it shares with its international partners and allies.” It is also stated that Saudi Arabia will continue to communicate with the Commission and looks forward to a constructive dialogue with its partners in the European Union to contribute to strengthening and supporting the means of countering money laundering and terrorism at the international and regional levels.
In this case, the United Kingdom government has taken the position similar to that one taken by the US with regard to the US territories. Like this, the UK has pushed back against the inclusion of Saudi Arabia to the list. And it is completely justified, considering the close economic ties between London and Riyadh.
By the way, it is important to recall that the European Parliament and Council are able to veto a delegated act of the Commission, so it would be definitely interesting to follow the further updates on the Commission’s list entrance into legal force and its fulfillment by the EU and US entities.
What should business do?
Recent tendencies within the EU legislation demonstrate that the EU becomes more rigorous in its AML/CFT efforts. This means that we can expect not only legislative and regulatory changes, but also increased attention to and oversight of regulated entities, namely banks and non-banking financial institutions.
In return, covered businesses may strive to adjust their risk scoring models by including newly-listed jurisdictions as those posing increased risk, in their response to tightening regulatory requirements and expectations. However, a practice of the last two decades demonstrates that many companies prefer to completely exclude particular types of businesses or entire jurisdictions from their clientele, rather than effectively mitigate correspondent risks (so-called “de-risking”).
Nevertheless, where one drops the opportunity, other picks it up. It is our position that a meaningful system of internal controls leveraged by cutting-edge regulatory technology solutions (known as ‘RegTech’) will equip businesses enough to find a balance between business opportunities and AML/CFT compliance. And if you check the recent statements from the US financial regulators about RegTech, you will find that the future of compliance is here.
Stay tuned with us on the most recent actions in regulatory compliance.
Disclaimer: the information in this article is provided for informational purposes only. You should not construe any such information as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Serhii Mokhniev, CAMS
Need a lawyer in this area?
6 years in AML